![Modern combat versus has controller support?](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/7_64e61dfbddf2b36517292648.png)
![mcneary v. freehold township mcneary v. freehold township](https://www.nj.com/resizer/tl9L8yPD2YFVlEBVEh91zGAvoss=/700x0/smart/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/JRF6F54MOVEZFGBDPVS3BI74WY.jpg)
This contrasts with a recent decision from Maine’s highest court, which held that compliance with an administrative order compelling an employer to subsidize an employee’s use of medical marijuana constitutes aiding and abetting, which is a violation of the CSA.Īnalysis: On June 28, 2018, Workers’ Compensation Judge Lionel Simon heard an application by Steven McNeary asking the court to compel Freehold to reimburse him for his medical marijuana purchases. Executive Summary: Rejecting Freehold Township’s claim the entire case was barred by the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), a workers’ compensation judge ruled the municipality must reimburse its employee for the cost of medical marijuana to treat his work-related injury.
![Modern combat versus has controller support?](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/7_64e61dfbddf2b36517292648.png)